![]() ![]() ![]() In case you’re wondering, the “Basic” authentication type uses your account’s username and password and has been deprecated by GitHub so it will stop working soon. In the popup that opens, select the “Authentication” tab and click on the “Add” button. In SourceTree, using the top menu navigate to Tools ⇒ Options. ![]() There are several ways of doing that and we’re going to use the easiest: connection over HTTPS.įirst make sure that, in your browser, you are logged in to your GitHub account. Once SourceTree is installed we need to add your GitHub account to it. I am not sure to what extent since I don’t have a Mac, but I believe the essentials are still pretty much the same. Getting SourceTree set upīefore we start it is worth noting that SourceTree is different on Mac and Windows. While installing SourceTree, provide your BitBucket credentials and, when asked, select Git and not Mercurial (another versioning system) unless you want to give it a try. In Github, you get only public repositories on the free plan. If you’re going to start using Git, it’s a good idea to have a BitBucket account since, unlike GitHub, they offer private repositories with their free accounts. BitBucket is a GitHub competitor from Atlassian, also makers of SourceTree. To install SourceTree you need a (free) BitBucket account. If you haven’t already, download SourceTree and install it. Posted by Nour Akalay on DecemUpdated on October 8, 2020. Let’s move on to serious stuff with SourceTree. In any case if it is believed that the way it currently behaves in Wappler is correct then I think we are better of to remove the rollback uncommitted files function altogether as in my view partial rollbacks are worse than no rollback.The Git and SourceTree beginner's guide to contributing to open-source projects in GitHub - Part 3 - Working with SourceTreeīy now you have learned the essential concepts you need to start using Git (part 1) and have done some forking and branching in GitHub (part 2) I really love the simplicity of Wappler and the way it allows us to do things in 1 application, but using GIT in Wappler for some things, and having to use a 3rd part GIT application for other functions defeats the purpose in my view. The way I use this often is to start with a clean GIT commit, then play around learning new things in current project and when I have figured it out I will roll back ALL uncommitted changes back to my known commit state. I guess in essence these new files are not in GIT yet so really don’t see why they shouldn’t be deleted when the user has selected them to be deleted? This behaviour is disorienting and confusing to an end user as without knowing the “how it is supposed to work” causes trust concerns as to what is rolled back and what is not, hence why I started using GitKraken for this function.įrom what I gather it is also different behaviour to the way GIT intended it to be used, at least when I look at how GitKraken does it, but by no means am I a GIT expert. Then through GIT (refer to my screenshot in earlier post) on delete the routes file is rolled back, but the new file remains in place effectively orphaned until a new route is created? ![]() Look at this situation in a nodejs project: lets say a new file is added, the routes file is updated to reflect the new route. I think the way it currently stands is confusing, and incorrect. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |